Links In Darkness: Tuesday 27th September – Sunday 2nd October

These are the selection of posts I found interesting between Tuesday and Sunday:

West Lothian looking into Solar and renewables

I learnt from @cowrin that Edinburgh council are looking to put solar panels on council house roofs.  Wondering if my local council had similar ideas, I did a quick search and yes, it appears that West Lothian Council are indeed getting in on the act.

Plans for a survey of council properties to assess their potential for solar energy as part of a new Renewables Strategy have been approved.

 

The long-term benefit of renewable energy for the council is reduced energy costs and the positive environmental impact.

 

The Council Executive (Tuesday 20 September) also agreed that the council will seek accreditation for the Microgeneration Certification Scheme by completing a suitable project early next year.  This will enable the council to develop its own workforce and take advantage of the current financial incentives that are available.

 

As Council leader Peter Johnston pointed out it will bring local jobs and income, and should be encouraged.  It will allow the local area to take charge of its energy sources and future.  A far cry from relying on big business or a massivly subsided nuclear power station.

It is not just councils that are looking into this.  The Scout Association are also looking into using the buildings they own to help cut down on running costs.

Links In Darkness: Wednesday 21st September – Tuesday 27th September

These are the selection of posts I found interesting between Wednesday and Tuesday:

Scientists are wrong

There was some quite incredible news today about the speed of light.  It turns out Einstein was wrong, as particle experiments at CERN indicate the have found faster than light particles.

Naturally, the hyperbole reached overdrive faster than the speed of light, but the weirdest response was from political hack Guido Fawkes who claimed that as science is never settled*, ”Scientists are not usually unanimous on any subject which is complex.” referring to the climate scare racket.  Oddly enough though, the scientists are pretty much unanimous on the science of climate change, and it is usually only right wing authority figures (and oil companies) who are against it as it would undermine their authority and they would make less money.

* Guido claimed that it was “settled science” that the earth was the centre of the universe, which more than makes my point, as it was the Roman Catholic church that thought this, from a position of authority, and they denied the “truth” against overwhelming scientific evidence. That the earth revolved round the sun was known as long ago as the ancient Greeks. The church were naturally doing this as the evidence undermined their authority and they would make less money from the people.  Sound familiar?

But, the point I want to make is that it is usually only other scientists that actually challenge the results of science.  Time and time again, the media lap up some study or paper claiming something, and then a few days later lap up a counter study.  Hey, it sells papers.

It is the scientists job to challenge, test and verify science.  Even with the faster than light results, the scientists who did the study want it checked saying “We are very much astonished by this result, but a result is never a discovery until other people confirm it” 

But climate change is constantly challenged and in the interests of “balance” we hear the other point of view. I’m just glad I don’t live in the US otherwise I’d have to put up with the creationists as well.

Suitably Inspiring

From my house, on the side of the Bathgate hills I can see far and wide. To the south Tinto pokes its head up, to the north Ben Lomond. Dotted around, are the scourge of views, wind farms. One of those wind farms is Fintry Community Wind Farm.

Whilst some wind farms are cash cows for a single land owner, or the developers, not Fintry. The village of Fintry secured a wind turbine on the farm, and take a 15th share of the income. Using that money, they are investing in both their village and their future. The plans are for a carbon neutral village.

If you see the countryside as something to look at, or as something to get away from humanity, then I can understand why you don’t like wind farms. However, some people have to live there. And the Fintry Wind Farm is part of their life, and is changing it for the better.

Wind of Change is a short documentary about the project and the wind farm, produced by Cornelia Reetz and I hope you will take 15 minutes to view it. Whilst it is easy to despair about the future, this video should be an inspiration for rural Scotland.

LibDems and their stance on Scotland

I’m getting quite annoyed by the Liberal Democrats stance in Scotland.  Take for example Michael Moore on Newsnight Scotland two nights ago.  He stated that the SNP’s stance on tax raising powers for Holyrood is “a lot of assertion and not a lot of detail” but when asked whether the LibDem’s idea of home rule include Corporation Tax being devolved, he couldn’t answer the question of whether it might be considered.

Instead the talk was of building consensus and “looking what is best for Scotland and seeing where Scotland wishes to go” 

Talk about a lack of detail.

I think it is pretty obvious where Scotland wants to go, and if it doesn’t involve quite a lot more fiscal autonomy, then the other option that to be picked will be independence.

The other problem with the Scottish Lib Dems today (apart from having just 5 MSPs) is the language being used.  I think it is totally counterproductive to use talk such as “SNP’s “bulldozer” approach” or “bullying” or “a national embarassment“(sic)

The “bulldozer approach to the single police force, like it or otherwise (and I don’t) was in the SNP manifesto and it is right that they implement it.  When did doing what you said you were going to become bullying?

I don’t think it is a very good idea to call the party that most people in Scotland voted for a national embarrassment.  Instead of snipping, look at what the people are saying.  If you don’t like it, try explaining why your ideas are better.  Don’t say “you voted for Alex Salmond, you are an idiot”

Increasely, you look like overlords from a foreign country telling people what to do, and why they are wrong.  Michael Moore and Danny Alexander might be Scottish MPs but they are representing a Coalition government that was not voted for in Scotland, so appears not to be Scottish.

The people of Scotland want more powers, and Michael Moore should be talking about finding out what the people want (working with the SNP on those referendum questions rather than trying to force then to ask just one question) instead of “building political consensus” which is just nonsense talk to the general public.

Links In Darkness: Thursday 15th September – Tuesday 20th September

These are the selection of posts I found interesting between Thursday and Tuesday:

Links In Darkness: Sunday 11th September – Wednesday 14th September

These are the selection of posts I found interesting between Sunday and Wednesday:

Links In Darkness: Tuesday 6th September – Saturday 10th September

These are the selection of posts I found interesting between Tuesday and Saturday: